I take music very personally. I can’t help it. If I were to die today, most of my regrets would involve music on some level. For instance, I never experienced a Dead C, Pharoah Sanders or Leonard Cohen concert. I recently discovered certain avant-garde composers and have yet to delve into their vast back catalogues. To me, if an album fails to deliver its promise, the trespass ranks worse than most personal let downs. Most of the time, critical acclaim generates a promise. Many times, I listen to critically recommended albums because the critic entices me with his description of the album. Sometimes, the comparison of the album being reviewed to an album or band I favor sparks my interest.
I hate to write about music criticism’s pratfalls again but the past two weeks really caused me to take a good long look at my critical methods. An inherent laziness flows through rock journalism today. In describing an album, self-aggrandizement and exaggeration run rampant, as pretentious prove their music trivia wizardry before disgracing a handful of classic albums. I thought this laziness resulted from the lack of listening to an album but it really spurns from the need to flex the obscure-band-knowledge-muscle. I stand guilty of these crimes, too, but at least I attempt to shoot around them.
When writing a critique, your duty is twofold. Readers should gain a basic understanding of the album through your assessment and the valuation should provide where the album fits canonically. Readers hate condescension. Using ten-dollar words and making ultra-hip references fails to translate into readership. The audience wants to come as close as to hearing music the music at hand as possible through reading your review.
Which brings me to my main point: classic albums should not be used as a reference point unless one draws an air-tight comparison. Really, for the love of music, stop comparing things to The Velvet Underground & Nico, The Stooges’ Funhouse or any other canonized album. Imagine if art critics compared every single painting in any given era of art to the Mona Lisa. Comparing new albums with the aforementioned albums is music criticism’s equivalent to this practice. Classic albums resonate with timeless music, great track selections and originality. Very few albums radiate with the spirit found on Funhouse. A concise, exciting album with perfect execution and track sequencing, Funhouse begins with lion roar riffage on “Down on the Street” and ends with a full-scale jungle riot on “L.A. Blues.” In between, the Ashton brothers and Iggy provide a glimpse into the derelict mind fueled by sex, drugs and dangerous guitar riffs. The album embodies the threat of rock and roll fully realized.
As with all classic albums, Funhouse sounds fresh today but bears evidence of the era in which the band created it. In comparing new albums to Funhouse, one denies significant historical and social changes adding to the progression of music. Iggy’s nihilistic lyrical excursions link to disillusionment with flower power. The mainstream failed to represent the Stooges. They dug sex, drugs and revolution but not the paisley paint and pansy posturing. Violence infected their hallucinatory visions as evidenced Iggy’s famous “television-ate-my-girlfriend” dream. Their music sounds like a bulldozer rolling over flower power.
Continually comparing new albums to classic ones devalues the classic work. Spin, Rolling Stone and every other major music magazine hailed The Strokes as the new Velvet Underground in 2001, although the Strokers music lacked VU’s urgency, inventive aesthetic or imagination. A new generation of music fans weaned at the teat of Julian Cassablanca already assumes the Velvet Underground sounds like a bunch of artless rich pretty boys.
Aside from the underlying implications, using certain classic albums as a comparative example just shows laziness on the writer’s part. The Stooges, Velvet Underground and the MC5 provide the easiest points of reference for a writer labeling an album as tuneful and artistically advanced. Often, the album in question lacks the power of classic albums but the critic wants to either pay his dues or heighten the new album’s credibility with a name-check.
Conversely, to compare new albums to classic records robs the new artwork at hand of a unique identity. If decades-old albums set a standard of beauty, we are setting an impossibly high bar for artists to high-jump over. The artists preoccupy themselves with aping styles pioneered 40 years ago instead of creating an original sound. No wonder this generation lacks originality and a distinctive voice. Hell, we can’t even gain an identifying generational label like “generation x,” “the me generation” or “the blank generation.”
This week’s picks:
Bruce Russell 21st Century Field Hollers and Prison Songs (w.m.o/r, 2006; Rococo, 2007): As one-third of Dead C, Russell’s powerful feedback zig-zags set a high bar for future basement meanderings. The lo-fi recording technique on the band’s early albums furthered their noise textures by adding an extra layer of hiss and an air of mystery. One could theorize the band used recording equipment as an instrument, allowing it to expand on instrumental landscapes. 21st Century Field Hollers and Prison Songs, a seamless venture into a parallel universe, builds on the tape experimentation of early Dead C, flowing from one experiment into the next with great ease. Each tune dons a pre-war blues title and each exhibits the feel of pre-war blues, although Russell uses a guitar like a percussion instrument and is more prone to use tape loops than acoustic instruments. Low-fidelity recording seems to be the common thread running through pre-war blues and Russell’s record, as many tunes contain his trademark fuzzy soundscapes. The dark, splintering groove of the first side mimics current hellish drones from harsh noise artists but shattered psychedelic guitar lines accentuate it, aligning it more with Nurse with Wound than Merzbow. “Kate’s Blues #3 [Death Letter]” continues in this vein, wrapping a black galaxy around a few shaky guitar mutters. Early Scott Walker-like vocals penetrate the tune, echoing into the dark atmosphere. “Nigerian Delta Oil Well Blues” continues the melting tape thread with backwards psych guitar zips creating headtrip techno before “Wehowsky’s Loop Blues” settles into musique concrete. Kitchen material clinks compliment the tune’s industrial din, as wind-up music box samples enter from a void and continually interrupt the piece. Air conditioning buzz permeates the tune, furthering the bleak atmosphere. Side two commences with the bouncing sound and stock car tape loop antics of “Black Car Blues.” Russell uses negative space to emulate the effect of cars racing around a track. The flickering of thick lo-fi recording amplifies negative space for an interesting experiment in and of itself. A few spare chords begin “Hiroshima Tourist Blues in Dub” and the song trots along like an old 78 with amplified scratches. Blips of Morricone fade in and pair with a wild slide guitar experiment to soundtrack a loner entering a desolate post-Civil War town. Like the rest of the album, it derives an antique feel from futuristic instrumentation.
Paul Kelday One Dimensional (Borft/UFO Mungo): Another loner with an analog synth. This record, comprised of recordings that originally appeared on reel-to-reels and cassettes from 1986 to 1990, wraps around the listener like a warm blanket slowly catching fire. Kelday seems like the bastard offspring of Zeit-era Tangerine Dream with an eye for dark hallucinations. Kelday’s lack of a biography adds to the record’s bleak atmosphere, as one mug-shot-style photo appears on the cover and the record contains limited production notes. His talent builds throughout the record and his compositions grow more complex. The strange analog synth worlds unravel at a lysergic pace, steadily warping thought patterns. These patterns pulsate, flicker and twist to a backbeat of moans and drones. Surprisingly, Kelday’s compositions venture pretty far into the darkness without becoming boring or channeling sci-fi laser drones. “Comet” plots the career trajectory of today’s synth molesters in the noise scene. As its unsettling pathway tunnels through underground dungeons, its cadence sways like a drunk about to crash. The second side begins with the horrific “Dehumanization Process,” in which voices fade from walls, break apart and strengthen as a pulsating synth pattern grounds the composition. “Gorgon” splays out with tantalizing electronic yells and slowly unveils warped carousel sounds. Limited edition of 300. Available from Fusetron and Enfant Terrible
That's all for now. More brewin' for later this week. Drop me a line at kobak77[at]yahoo[dot]com. Make sure to write a subject line that sets yourself apart from spam.


